IP Video Surveillance News and Reviews
Search:
Login
The Source for Video Surveillance See Plans and Prices - IP Video Pro Service

Update on General: What Makes an Analyst Independent?

Posted on Feb 06, 2010

Those who make recommendations on products need to be independent of those who develop them. We are committed to maximizing our independence. 

An upcoming February webinar makes this matter timely. Aimetis is sponsoring a webinar where an analyst shares his 'independent' test results on Aimetis as well as two of Aimetis's competitors. This raises the question: How can a webinar sponsored by one vendor be objective or independent about the comparative test results of other vendors?

The webinar does not disclose financial considerations. However, the analyst's initial reporting of their findings mentioned that they received no funding for the test but that they would charge publishing rights for re-printing of the findings. Subsequently, Aimetis issued a press release touting the results with multiple quotes from the analyst. Now, a webinar is being held.

In light of this we would like to explain our own approach to independence. Specifically:

  • We do not accept consulting from manufacturers.
  • We do not accept sponsorships nor advertising from manufacturers.
  • We do not sell re-print rights to our reporting.
  • We do not charge for our product tests, reviews or other reporting.
  • We do not accept trips or entertainment from manufacturers.
  • We do not charge for speaking (whether webinars, events, etc.)
  • The only money manufacturers can spend with us is to sign up for our subscription service (like anyone in the community). We purposefully set low rates for unlimited company access ($499 per year) to make sure that manufacturers could not use this to bribe us (e.g., buy more seat licenses to our subscription to influence us).
  • Many of you know I am speaking at Milestone's MIPS event in February about IP camera tests. I am paying my entire way - airfare, hotel, car rental, etc. etc. Furthermore, I am not being paid (nor have I ever been paid by Milestone). The Milestone event is useful for me to meet lots of integrators, camera manufacturers and analytic developers in one place, in a small form where I can have extensive conversations with people. That being said, even the suggestion of impropriety worries me and I may not go again. [Related Note: Read my critical review of Milestone's VMS]

We believe doing this is critical to our long term success and our commitment to providing high quality research and analysis. The easy way out is clearly to take significant money from manufacturers. It's a short term sacrifice but key to building a strong foundation to benefit our members.

If you have questions or concerns, I encourage you to raise them so we can provide the utmost transparency.




Other Updates on General

Weekly Video Surveillance Link Roundup on Aug 28, 2010
The following 100+ results are matches from our spider for newly added manufacturer websites over...

Laws / Regulations for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2010
In this update, we examine laws and regulations for video surveillance developed by a variety of ...

Y-Cam Camera Overview on Jul 12, 2010
Y-Cam is a UK camera manufacturer specializing in the residential and SMB market segments. They o...

SDM 100 Security Integrators 2009 Released on Jul 08, 2010
SDM Magazine has released its annual Top 100 Security Integrators 2009 ranking. SDM summed up the...

South African Surveillance and Security Needs on Jun 23, 2010
South Africa has a global reputation as one of the most dangerous places in the world. With highe...

Why Does the UK Hate IP Video Surveillance? on Jun 22, 2010
When not destoying US oceans, the British can be reflective and quite self-critical. This is nice...

Security vs Productivity on Jun 11, 2010
All security measures invariably generate tradeoffs with productivity and convenience. Security m...

Security Manufacturer Representative Roles Examined on Jun 06, 2010
In this update, we survey key roles, benefits and issues in using manufacturer representatives wi...

UK Debates the Value and Risks of CCTV on Jun 06, 2010
The UK seems simultaneously more passionate and worried about the use of CCTV / video surveillanc...

Is Price Pressure for IP Video Increasing? on May 17, 2010
A consistent theme integrators report is competition for jobs has increased significantly in the ...


Most Recent Industry Updates

Genetec CEO Interview and Our Analysis on Sep 02, 2010
In this note, we summarize and provide analysis on Canada's SP&T excellent interview with Gen...

Discussing Network Switch Key Criteria on Sep 02, 2010
This note summarizes key criteria in selecting network switches. From a 80+ comment thread on our...

Video : Powerhouse :: Access : Arthouse on Aug 30, 2010
Most industry people are well aware that video surveillance attracts far more interest than acces...

Smartphone Explosive Growth Impacting Video Surveillance on Aug 29, 2010
Smartphone explosive growth will disrupt video surveillance user's expectations and interfaces us...

Weekly Video Surveillance Link Roundup on Aug 28, 2010
The following 100+ results are matches from our spider for newly added manufacturer websites over...

March Networks Best Quarter in a Few Years on Aug 27, 2010
Calendar Q2 2010 financial results show that March Networks had its best performance in over 2 ye...

HDcctv Adoption and Barriers Examined on Aug 27, 2010
With HDcctv production release starting, speculation on its ultimate success and market share has...

Examining the Growth Rate for Megapixel Cameras on Aug 26, 2010
In this note, we examine the future growth rate and transition towards megapixel cameras. Based o...

Exacq's Financial Position and Growth Examined on Aug 24, 2010
The following note overviews Exacq's financial position and growth based on a conversation with t...

Buying Coverage - Rising Trend on Aug 23, 2010
Buying coverage in trade magazine and industry websites is a rising trend that will impact inform...

IP Video Market Info 2010