IP Video Surveillance News and Reviews
Search:
Login
The Source for Video Surveillance See Plans and Prices - IP Video Pro Service

Should You Use Auto-Tracking PTZs?

by John Honovich, IP Video Market Info posted on Sep 25, 2008 About John Contact John


Though available for many years, Auto-Tracking PTZs are generating renewed interest with Axis' recent release of their 233D camera.  The claim is that "auto-tracking enables a single PTZ dome camera to cover a large area and to automatically detect, follow and record video of moving persons or vehicles."

Auto-Tracking has never become an widely adopted feature despite its introduction and marketing by various manufacturers.  The question then becomes: should you use it and where should you use it?

Below view a video of Axis demonstrating auto-tracking PTZ functionality or download the clip.  After, we will consider its value.

The demo provides a very honest portrayal of the key issues involved in setting up and using auto-tracking PTZs. Essentially, the tracking is designed to track the object with the most movement or greatest size.  There are some major drawbacks including:

  • The feature can track irrelevant objects like flags or other uninteresting moving objects.
  • The feature can switch tracking from a relevant to an irrelevant object simply because the second object was bigger.
  • These problems increase as the size of the area and the amount of activity increases.  For instance, this would likely work extremely poorly in a football stadium parking lot during game day as hundreds of cars and people move around.
As such, it seems this feature is likely most useful in small areas with light traffic.  This is where I have used this feature with other camera manufacturer's in the past.  Often, we wind up turning it off because the camera made mistakes and the security manager found setting a wide field of view preset or a continuous pan to be the least confusing setup for the PTZ.

Today, I would prefer to use a 2MP - 5MP camera for the type of scenario pictured in this demo.  Rather than risk the problems of incorrectly tracking, the megapixel camera guarantees evidence across the entire area.  Operators can then use digital zooms either in real time or for investigations to get exactly the image they need.

Even on a cost basis, a megapixel camera plus the addiitonal storage is no more expensive than a PTZ.  For instance, the 233D costs about $3,000 USD while a megapixel camera costs around $1,000 with an extra $2,000 or so for more storage.

I see this as part of the general trend why megapixel is gaining rapid acceptance and positive satisfaction while video analytics are still dealing with accuracy and optimization issues.  While megapixel does not offer as much as video analytics, what it does it does well.  The reduced risk and increased simplicity spurs uptake.  I see this as the better choice to auto-tracking PTZs.  Thoughts?




Most Recent Industry Reports

Testing Cisco-Linksys Switch for IP Video (SRW208P) on Sep 01, 2010
Switch selection for IP video surveillance is a key consideration in overall design. Unfortunately, it is often less scrutinized than the 'stars' of the solution (i.e., VMS and cameras). Moreo...

Testing Milestone GO VMS (Free 8 Ch) on Aug 29, 2010
Milestone's aggressive moves targeting the smaller video surveillance systems continue. This month's release of a free 8 channel VMS, called XProtect Go, adds to their June 2010 release that droppe...

Testing the iCam VMS / iPhone App on Aug 29, 2010
Home video surveillance systems are quickly getting a lot better and a lot cheaper. A good example of this is an application called iCam that has recently been in the news for helping a homeowner d...

Training: VSaaS Hosted/Managed Basics on Aug 22, 2010
This hour long training explains the basics behind Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS). If you want to learn about the most talked about emerging trend in the industry, this is an ideal place t...

Training: Megapixel / HD Basics on Aug 18, 2010
This report provides a 95 minute video series that teaches the fundamentals of using, selecting and applying megapixel video surveillance in real world deployments. We cover 9 fundamental aspects: ...

Real World CCTV / Surveillance Success on Aug 16, 2010
In this report, we find, review and share 50+ real world success stories using video surveillance. These are actual documented examples where crimes, murders, thefts and more have been recorded and...

Testing Archerfish Solo Smart Camera / DVR / VSaas (Cernium) on Aug 09, 2010
Combining many video surveillance functionalities in a single device is a growing trend. The hope is providing a turn-key, 'all-in-one' solution simplifies deployment and provides everything one ne...

Directory of Budget / Home / SMB IP Cameras on Aug 07, 2010
We have completed a broad testing program of budget IP cameras for use in the home or SMB markets. This directory provides links to each test. Full test results including video screencasts and vid...

Testing Rogo's Managed VSaaS on Aug 04, 2010
Managed / hosted video offerings continue to expand with a variety of technical and business approaches. In this test, we examine Rogo's Managed Video offering. The system uses an on-site recordin...

Testing Lorex's IP Camera (LNE1001) on Aug 03, 2010
Simplifying remote viewing is a key element in choosing and using IP cameras for home and small business users. Doing it the 'old fashion' way can require technical skill, be cumbersome and frustra...

IP Video Market Info 2010