Clicky Web Analytics
IP Video Surveillance News and Reviews
Search:
Login
The Source for Video Surveillance Get the Free 2010 Video Surveillance eBook
Email Address:

Does Lower Expectations Solve Video Analytics Problems?

by John Honovich, IP Video Market Info posted on Oct 09, 2008 About John Contact John


An increasingly popular but dangerous trend is the argument that expectations for video analytics need to be lowered.  The thinking is that since video analytics have had problems in the field, if we lower the demands on what video analytics need to do, customers will be more satisfied. This report explains why this is wishful but deeply problematic thinking.

What are Expectations Today?

My experience talking with hundreds of people on analytics is that most of them expect video analytics to work consistently with almost no false alerts and simple setup.

Aren't some Expectations Unrealistic?

Sure. One time a VC asked me if we could do an analytic that detected blinking so that a hostage could secretly trigger an alert. Another time a Program Manager at a defense contractor asked me if we could send an alert if a person got on a train with a package but did not have the package when he exited the train at another station.

In my experience, these are exceptions.  I cannot remember a security manager asking for a science fiction video analytic setup. They consistenly ask for and expect performance to meet their operational needs.

What would we Lower Expectations To?

A number of leading experts suggest that our expectations should be that video analytics will have moderate false alerts, require significant on-site setup and have significant limitations on use.

The Impact of Lower Expectations

While this may be the truth for many video analytic offerings, such expectations would kill the video analytics industry.  These lower expectations would make video analytics useless to almost all security managers.  The capital and ongoing operational cost to handle such a limited performance solution would be very difficult to justify.

The Solution is Making It Work

Sometimes, lowering expectations just is not tenable. You cannot ask parents to simply lower their expectations when their child is failing out of 8th grade. Likewise, you cannot expect security managers to simply accept performance that would undermine their operations.

The only solution for the industry is to make it work and to prove that it works. Part of our challenge is that it's so hard to know if and how well any video analytic works. If you are a vendor and are interested in doing so, let's talk. I would be happy to do so and share the results with the community. Anyone who has first hand experience, please share your results.





Most Recent Industry Reports

Education: IP Network Basics for Video Surveillance on Mar 14, 2010
Understanding IP networks is increasingly critical to designing and deploying video surveillance. In this special report, we provide nearly 2 hours of video training on the key issues, technologies...

Are Security Companies Guilty of Fear Mongering? on Mar 14, 2010
There's a line between educating people on risks and scaring them to buy products. How often do security companies cross that line? A recent US TV comedy mocks Broadview, a company acquired by ind...

Video Surveillance Industry Weekly - Mar 12 2010 on Mar 12, 2010
New funding, new panoramic from Mobotix, more analytic bashing and the power of IT managers examined. All updates are available to premium members inside.

Testing Avigilon ControlCenter VMS on Mar 09, 2010
While Avigilon is best known for its high resolution cameras (up to 16 MP), Avigilon offers its own VMS, Control Center, a system that is required for using their cameras. With interest in megapixe...

2010 Video Surveillance Industry Guide on Mar 08, 2010
The 612 page 2010 Video Surveillance Industry Guide provides the most comprehensive global coverage of the market, companies and products in video surveillance. It aggregates key analysis and resea...

Testing Digifort's VMS (Version 6.3) on Mar 07, 2010
As video management software matures, more choices are emerging from around the globe. In the past year, we have heard increasing discussion about the use of Digifort, a company based in Brazil, no...

Testing Vitamin D Video Analytics Software on Mar 06, 2010
With significant tech blog coverage, Vitamin D has generated widespread interest in using their video analytics. Two of the most commonly cited points is their technology, called HTM, that is based...

Video Surveillance Industry Weekly - Mar 5 2010 on Mar 05, 2010
This week: Falling Analog sales.The future of GE Security. New Investments. New info on key startup and more. Aggregates premium weekly updates.

Testing LuxRiot VMS (Version 1.7) on Mar 01, 2010
As video management software matures, complaints increase about its high price. Even a small deployment of 16 cameras in a single site can cost $1,500 - $2,500 for basic VMS software without any en...

February 2010 Video Surveillance Monthly Summary on Mar 01, 2010
Lots of research and heated discussions in February, despite little industry news. Most read topics included our megapixel camera test results comparison, the future of security integrators and the...

IP Video Market Info 2010