Clicky Web Analytics
IP Video Surveillance News and Reviews
Search:
Login
The Source for Video Surveillance Get the Free 2010 Video Surveillance eBook
Email Address:

How Apple Impacts Video Surveillance

by John Honovich, IP Video Market Info posted on Sep 04, 2008 About John Contact John


Apple's interest in video surveillance is generating significant interest. This report examines the key areas where Apple will (and will not) impact the video surveillance industry.

Key Impact - iPhone/iPod touch

The Apple iPhone (and iPod touch) will finally make mobile video surveillance a major element of video surveillance, improving security operations and helping to reduce crime.  For a number of years, video surveillance vendors have touted mobile video despite minimal practical applications.  The Apple iPhone will overcome the technical and logistical problems that undermined earlier efforts of video surveillance companies to deploy mobile monitoring.

Background

Apple and videoNEXT co-hosted a panel at ASIS driving speculation on Apple's involvement in video surveillance has become intense.

Disclaimer: this report is my personal observations based on no private knowledge of Apple's plan.

Overview of Apple's Benefits

Today, two Apple products have potential use to video surveillance systems: the Xserve and the iPhone

The Xserve is Apple's high end server that can be used for running IP video surveillance software (for instance, VideoNext has announced support for the Xserve).  However, Apple's servers do not offer breakthrough benefits for video surveillance plus most video surveillance software is not developed to run on the Apple OS. Nonetheless, for those software providers that do run on the Apple OS, expect this to be a key benefit in growing segments such as the education market.

The iPhone is essentially a phone/portable PC that can run 3rd party applications like video surveillance client software (the iPhone touch is fundamentally the iPhone without phone/3G service). For instance, videoNEXT will be announcing their iPhone application in the coming weeks.

That being said, I see no reason why Apple would buy video surveillance companies. Unlike Cisco, Apple has not historically bought companies to build broad product portfolios. Apple generally develops internally while acquiring strategic technologies to support their products.

Apple looks to benefit from video surveillance by driving adoption of their core products (such as Xserve and the iPhone) through the use of video surveillance applictions that are processor and bandwidth intensive.

Traditional Mobile Video Surveillance

Mobile video surveillance offers significant value for security operations:

  1. Being at a PC is not ideal for general monitoring: Most security monitors (despite stereotypes) have many responsibilities that require them to multi-task and frequently be away from a desk/PC.
  2. Responding requires security to be away from a PC: Intercepting real-time threats requires security operators to be moving towards the suspect.

Both of these points are well understood and have been the motivation for years to make surveillance more mobile.

Nonetheless, mobile video surveillance for PDAs and phones have been quite limited.  In fact, relative to the amount of vendor promotion, it always surprises me how little use there actually is.

In my experience and that of other integrators, it has been the practical issues involved that have undermined the use of mobile video surveillance.  Issues such as:

  • Difficulties in determining what devices to run the software on
  • Difficulties in loading/updating software on the PDA/phone
  • Difficulties in using software on the PDA/phone
  • Problems in providing bandwidth coverage
  • Need to have a phone and a secondary device dedicated to mobile surveillance

Apple iPhone Advantages for Mobile Surveillance

The iPhone offers 2 fundamental advantages over traditional devices for mobile video surveillance:

  1. A vastly easier to use and more powerful phone
  2. Their AppStore makes adding and updating third party applications easy

The general benefits of the iPhone are well discussed.  Specific elements that are critical to video surveillance are 3G wireless (for receiving video streams without depending on wifi) and the iPhone's superior abilities to display video and 3d graphics.  A potentially lesser appreciated feature is the built-in GPS locator that could provide significant benefits in helping responders locate where they are relative to the video they are viewing.

The AppStore is particularly important.  AppStore makes it simple for users to simply access, install and upgrade new applications.  This is especially valuable when contrasted to the traditional business model of mobile phone providers. In the traditional model, providers sought to limit and lock down what applications could be loaded on their phones. This made distributing and using 3rd party applications (like video monitoring client software) especially tricky.

The AppStore looks to make installing video surveillance clients as simply as downloading a song from iTunes.  This will make a major difference in the uptake of mobile surveillance.

Technicals Challenges for iPhone Development

A number of meaninful challenges exist for iPhone development. (This section is technical, skip to the conclusion if you prefer).

The fundamental issues are:

  • Most video surveillance software development is done using Microsoft's .NET framework, essentially incompatible with MAC OS X (this impact is quite significant on the server side but is only mildly problematic when developing client apps for the iPhone)
  • iPhone deveopment requires the use of a language Objective C and development environment different from 'normal' video surveillance tools (C#/Visual Studio or Java/Eclipse).
  • Many video surveillance companies use ActiveX controls to stream/display video in client software. iPhones do not support them.
  • You can only develop for iPhone apps on Macs (a problem if you are using Visual Studio running on a PC for .NET development)

None of these are truly deal-breakers for a moden video surveillance software company.  However, it will take time and a commitment of resources for many to make this happen.  Some companies will move quicker (for instance VideoNext does significant programming in C so this makes the transition easier).

Conclusion

By the end of the year, more than 10 million iPhones are projected to be sold, an increasing number for enterprise users.  As such, the features, functionalities and mass of users are growing to make iPhone an ideal choice to make mobile video surveillance a reality.





Most Recent Industry Reports

Education: IP Network Basics for Video Surveillance on Mar 14, 2010
Understanding IP networks is increasingly critical to designing and deploying video surveillance. In this special report, we provide nearly 2 hours of video training on the key issues, technologies...

Are Security Companies Guilty of Fear Mongering? on Mar 14, 2010
There's a line between educating people on risks and scaring them to buy products. How often do security companies cross that line? A recent US TV comedy mocks Broadview, a company acquired by ind...

Video Surveillance Industry Weekly - Mar 12 2010 on Mar 12, 2010
New funding, new panoramic from Mobotix, more analytic bashing and the power of IT managers examined. All updates are available to premium members inside.

Testing Avigilon ControlCenter VMS on Mar 09, 2010
While Avigilon is best known for its high resolution cameras (up to 16 MP), Avigilon offers its own VMS, Control Center, a system that is required for using their cameras. With interest in megapixe...

2010 Video Surveillance Industry Guide on Mar 08, 2010
The 612 page 2010 Video Surveillance Industry Guide provides the most comprehensive global coverage of the market, companies and products in video surveillance. It aggregates key analysis and resea...

Testing Digifort's VMS (Version 6.3) on Mar 07, 2010
As video management software matures, more choices are emerging from around the globe. In the past year, we have heard increasing discussion about the use of Digifort, a company based in Brazil, no...

Testing Vitamin D Video Analytics Software on Mar 06, 2010
With significant tech blog coverage, Vitamin D has generated widespread interest in using their video analytics. Two of the most commonly cited points is their technology, called HTM, that is based...

Video Surveillance Industry Weekly - Mar 5 2010 on Mar 05, 2010
This week: Falling Analog sales.The future of GE Security. New Investments. New info on key startup and more. Aggregates premium weekly updates.

Testing LuxRiot VMS (Version 1.7) on Mar 01, 2010
As video management software matures, complaints increase about its high price. Even a small deployment of 16 cameras in a single site can cost $1,500 - $2,500 for basic VMS software without any en...

February 2010 Video Surveillance Monthly Summary on Mar 01, 2010
Lots of research and heated discussions in February, despite little industry news. Most read topics included our megapixel camera test results comparison, the future of security integrators and the...

IP Video Market Info 2010